<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>blogaritaville</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scriban.com/movabletype/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://scriban.com/movabletype/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:scriban.com,2008-12-26:/movabletype//1</id>
    <updated>2010-02-11T05:48:55Z</updated>
    <subtitle>written by george scriban</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.3-en</generator>

<entry>
    <title>Nearly a decade later</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scriban.com/movabletype_archives/2010/02/nearly-a-decade.shtml" />
    <id>tag:scriban.com,2010:/movabletype//1.2644</id>

    <published>2010-02-11T05:46:57Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-11T05:48:55Z</updated>

    <summary>It&apos;s nearly a decade later, but I look at these pictures, and I still can&apos;t comprehend it....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>george scriban</name>
        <uri>http://scriban.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://scriban.com/movabletype/">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's nearly a decade later, but I look at <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/11/nyregion/11groundzero.html">these pictures</a>, and I still can't comprehend it.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Maybe there is a step three*</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scriban.com/movabletype_archives/2010/02/maybe-there-is.shtml" />
    <id>tag:scriban.com,2010:/movabletype//1.2643</id>

    <published>2010-02-03T03:05:05Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-03T03:18:04Z</updated>

    <summary>This crystallized what I had been thinking about the iPad, and now I&apos;m convinced that there&apos;s something very big in that little device. Computers are still too hard for most people to comfortably and enjoyably use The iPhone is so simple, my three year-old can use it The iPad is...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>george scriban</name>
        <uri>http://scriban.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://scriban.com/movabletype/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://northtemple.com/2010/02/01/on-ipads-grandmas-and-gam">This</a> crystallized what I had been thinking about the iPad, and now I'm convinced that there's something very big in that little device.</p>

<ol>
	<li>Computers are still too hard for most people to comfortably and enjoyably use</li>
	<li>The iPhone is so simple, my three year-old can use it</li>
	<li>The iPad is a lot like an iPhone with a computer-sized screen, and powerful software that lets you do stuff</li>
</ol>

<p>(link via <a href="http://www.daringfireball.net/">Daring Fireball</a>)</p>

<p>*Apple launched the iMac with <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uXJlX50Lj8">a Jeff Goldblum-narrated commercial</a> showing just how easy Apple made getting connected to the internet. After saying "presenting three easy steps to the internet," the commercial shows two, and then..."there's no step three!"</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title><![CDATA[Big Content&rsquo;s Greatest Hits: 100 years of copyfight!]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scriban.com/movabletype_archives/2009/10/big-contents-gr.shtml" />
    <id>tag:scriban.com,2009:/movabletype//1.2642</id>

    <published>2009-10-12T19:11:28Z</published>
    <updated>2009-10-12T19:11:30Z</updated>

    <summary>I don’t know that I could do anything that would add to this compendium of craven copyright panic; Big Content takes a mighty length of rope and coils it around its own neck just fine. Copyright expert William Patry put it strongly at the conclusion of his new book, Moral...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>george scriban</name>
        <uri>http://scriban.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://scriban.com/movabletype/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I don’t know that I could do anything that would add to this compendium of craven copyright panic; Big Content takes a mighty length of rope and coils it around its own neck just fine.</p>  <blockquote>Copyright expert William Patry put it strongly at the conclusion of his new book, <em>Moral Panics and the Copyright Wars</em>, writing, &quot;I cannot think of a single significant innovation in either the creation or distribution of works of authorship that owes its origins to the copyright industries.&quot;</blockquote>  <blockquote>   <p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/10/100-years-of-big-content-fearing-technologyin-its-own-words.ars/2">100 years of Big Content fearing technology—in its own words - Ars Technica</a></p></blockquote>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title><![CDATA[Like goldy and bronzy, but made out of iron&hellip;]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scriban.com/movabletype_archives/2009/10/like-goldy-and.shtml" />
    <id>tag:scriban.com,2009:/movabletype//1.2641</id>

    <published>2009-10-09T20:50:34Z</published>
    <updated>2009-10-09T20:50:37Z</updated>

    <summary>Today’s mind-melting post, wherein the fourth estate bitches about the way readers like to get their news, threatens to make news artificially scarce and expensive, and likens search engines to “plagiarists.” All from a stage in freed0m-loving Beijing. BEIJING — The leaders of two of the world&apos;s major news organizations...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>george scriban</name>
        <uri>http://scriban.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://scriban.com/movabletype/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s mind-melting post, wherein the fourth estate bitches about the way readers like to get their news, threatens to make news artificially scarce and expensive, and likens search engines to “plagiarists.”</p>  <p>All from a stage in freed0m-loving Beijing. </p>  <blockquote>   <p>BEIJING — The leaders of two of the world's major news organizations said Friday that it is time for search engines and others who use news content for free to pay up.</p>    <p>The comments from Tom Curley of The Associated Press and News Corp.'s Rupert Murdoch come as the media industry struggles in the Internet age. Many news companies contend that sites such as Google have reaped a fortune from their articles, photos and video without fairly compensating the news organizations producing the material</p> </blockquote>  <blockquote>   <p><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j-QHPkd1wPcAZL8SOqSTACDn33TgD9B7G7TG0">The Associated Press: AP, News Corp bosses tell search engines to pay up</a></p> </blockquote>  <p>I found this story courtesy of an aggregator (Techmeme) and read it hosted on the noted running dog lackey of the plagiarists’ website, Google News.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title><![CDATA[Qaddafi&rsquo;s First U.N. Speech Is a Rambling Diatribe]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scriban.com/movabletype_archives/2009/09/qaddafis-first.shtml" />
    <id>tag:scriban.com,2009:/movabletype//1.2640</id>

    <published>2009-09-23T20:30:15Z</published>
    <updated>2009-09-23T20:30:23Z</updated>

    <summary>Or it’s a work of statesman/marketing genius: The Israeli-Palestinian conflict, he said, should be solved by the creation of a single state, which Mr. Qaddafi called Isratine Qaddafi’s First U.N. Speech Is a Rambling Diatribe - NYTimes.com...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>george scriban</name>
        <uri>http://scriban.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://scriban.com/movabletype/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Or it’s a work of statesman/marketing genius: </p>  <blockquote>The Israeli-Palestinian conflict, he said, should be solved by the creation of a single state, which Mr. Qaddafi called Isratine</blockquote>  <p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/24/world/24nations.html?_r=1&amp;hp">Qaddafi’s First U.N. Speech Is a Rambling Diatribe - NYTimes.com</a></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Apple said, Google said, and I don&apos;t care</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scriban.com/movabletype_archives/2009/09/apple-said-goog.shtml" />
    <id>tag:scriban.com,2009:/movabletype//1.2639</id>

    <published>2009-09-19T18:17:09Z</published>
    <updated>2009-09-19T18:55:51Z</updated>

    <summary>Top of the Techmeme pops, once again, is Google Voice versus Apple&apos;s App Store: I must be missing something, because I can&apos;t bring myself to care less. Arrington invokes nuclear war. Others scream &quot;Liar! You Lie!&quot; Me? I&apos;m unmoved by the prospect of one company telling another company &quot;try again.&quot;...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>george scriban</name>
        <uri>http://scriban.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://scriban.com/movabletype/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.techmeme.com/090919/p12#a090919p12">Top of the Techmeme pops</a>, once again, is Google Voice versus Apple's App Store:</p>

<p><img alt="Picture 1.png" src="http://scriban.com/movabletype/Picture%201.png" width="588" height="467" class="mt-image-none" style="" /></p>

<p>I must be missing something, because I can't bring myself to care less. Arrington invokes nuclear war. Others scream "Liar! You Lie!" Me? I'm unmoved by the prospect of one company telling another company "try again." You'd have to be crazy to think that a Google Voice app is anything other than a Trojan Horse designed to make Google's services central to people using mobile devices. Why do you think Google's licensing fee for Android is $0? Because the services that make Android useful all run through the Googleplex. Any mobile platform into which Google can't embed itself represents users they can't fully monetize.</p>

<p>And Apple's not about to let another company use their end-to-end solution as a way to determine Apple's fate. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Glad I missed the meeting</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scriban.com/movabletype_archives/2009/09/glad-i-missed-t.shtml" />
    <id>tag:scriban.com,2009:/movabletype//1.2638</id>

    <published>2009-09-11T05:19:55Z</published>
    <updated>2009-09-11T05:24:09Z</updated>

    <summary>I was sort of bummed that, for the third time in a row, circumstances kept me from the company meeting. Now I&apos;m kinda glad: Ballmer grabbed the Apple device from the employee and made some funny remarks as everyone booed. Then he put it on the ground and pretended to...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>george scriban</name>
        <uri>http://scriban.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://scriban.com/movabletype/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I was sort of bummed that, for the third time in a row, circumstances kept me from the company meeting. Now I'm kinda glad:</p>

<blockquote>Ballmer grabbed the Apple device from the employee and made some funny remarks as everyone booed. Then he put it on the ground and pretended to stomp on it, before walking away.

<p>The scene was visible on the big screen, so even people in the upper deck could see what was happening. Later, during his presentation on stage, Ballmer referred to the episode again, teasing the person and making it clear that he hadn't forgotten what happened.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2009/09/ballmer_spots_microsoft_employee_with_iphone_at_company_meeting.html">Rule No. 1: Hide the iPhone from Ballmer at the Microsoft meeting</a></blockquote></p>

<p>Not sure I would been able to let my boss' boss' boss' boss' boss mime stomping my iPhone&mdash;I've only barely let my <em>kids</em> start holding it. Would have been significantly career-limiting to tackle the CEO at the big company hootenanny.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Running out of oxygen?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scriban.com/movabletype_archives/2009/09/running-out-of.shtml" />
    <id>tag:scriban.com,2009:/movabletype//1.2637</id>

    <published>2009-09-06T17:31:54Z</published>
    <updated>2009-09-06T17:36:25Z</updated>

    <summary>The hot air is plentiful as clashing conference organizers try to wring the last few bucks out of the hands of the last few suckers entrepreneurs and investors left in the tech industry: In a video announcing Audience, Mr. Feldman promised &quot;no talk of Twitter -- in fact, there won&apos;t...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>george scriban</name>
        <uri>http://scriban.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://scriban.com/movabletype/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The hot air is plentiful as clashing conference organizers try to wring the last few bucks out of the hands of the last few suckers entrepreneurs and investors left in the tech industry:</p>

<blockquote>In a video announcing Audience, Mr. Feldman promised "no talk of Twitter -- in fact, there won't be Twitter." And no ziplock bags, a crack at Mr. Pulver's "personal social-networking toolkit," which consists of a sandwich bag with a pen and name badges.

<p>"I was appalled at the 140 Conference, and truthfully, I'm appalled at the Twitter conferences in general," Mr. Feldman said. For the marketers attending them, he asked, "Do you really need instruction on how to use Twitter? Shouldn't you already know that?"</p>

<p>He also cited Guardian writer Paul Carr's takedown of the event, especially its admission fee. Mr. Feldman didn't attend -- he was at another conference, in Ireland.</p>

<p>Mr. Pulver declined to engage in conference trash-talk. "This is just bait, and I don't bite," Mr. Pulver said from London. "But I wish them luck. I think diversity makes the world a better place, and I'll leave it at that."</p>

<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/09/04/battle-of-the-techie-conferences/?mod=rss_WSJBlog?mod=">WSJ: Techie conference smackdown</a></blockquote></p>

<p>It's the same names saying the same thing over and over again in the same settings; only the locations change.</p>

<p>Seems like we're complicating something very simple: there's stuff that people need and like to use, and stuff that people need and like to make. When that's the same stuff, everyone wins.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title><![CDATA[Sun&rsquo;s customers are twisting in the wind]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scriban.com/movabletype_archives/2009/09/suns-customers.shtml" />
    <id>tag:scriban.com,2009:/movabletype//1.2636</id>

    <published>2009-09-03T15:56:41Z</published>
    <updated>2009-09-03T15:56:43Z</updated>

    <summary> I have no special knowledge of what Oracle envisioned from acquiring Sun’s hardware business and customer base, but with this: The deal had been backed by Sun shareholders in July and by the U.S. Justice Department in August, leaving EU consent as the last obstacle to its conclusion. Analysts...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>george scriban</name>
        <uri>http://scriban.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://scriban.com/movabletype/">
        <![CDATA[<p> I have no special knowledge of what Oracle envisioned from acquiring Sun’s hardware business and customer base, but with this:</p>  <blockquote>   <p>The deal had been backed by Sun shareholders in July and by the U.S. Justice Department in August, leaving EU consent as the last obstacle to its conclusion. Analysts had expected it to pass muster in Brussels with little fanfare. </p>    <p>But Neelie Kroes, the EU competition commissioner, announced instead that an in-depth investigation would be opened. </p> </blockquote>  <blockquote>   <p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/04/technology/companies/04oracle.html?_r=1&amp;hp">E.U. to Review Oracle’s Takeover of Sun Microsystems - NYTimes.com</a></p> </blockquote>  <p>The hardware customers are twisting in the wind, and I bet HP and IBM are only too happy to offer those users a new, more stable home for their server needs.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Windows Live Writer 1, Mac OS X blog editors 0</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scriban.com/movabletype_archives/2009/08/windows-live-wr.shtml" />
    <id>tag:scriban.com,2009:/movabletype//1.2635</id>

    <published>2009-08-28T23:48:35Z</published>
    <updated>2009-08-28T23:50:45Z</updated>

    <summary>This one&apos;s for my co-workers who bleed Microsoft. I love my iMac, and I&apos;m super keen on Snow Leopard. You&apos;ll pry my iPhone from my cold, dead hands. But, damn it if Windows Live Writer doesn&apos;t just beat the hell out of every Mac OS X blog editing app I&apos;ve...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>george scriban</name>
        <uri>http://scriban.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://scriban.com/movabletype/">
        <![CDATA[<p>This one's for my co-workers who bleed Microsoft.</p>

<p>I love my iMac, and I'm super keen on Snow Leopard. You'll pry my iPhone from my cold, dead hands. But, damn it if <a href="http://download.live.com/writer">Windows Live Writer</a> doesn't just beat the hell out of every Mac OS X blog editing app I've tried. MarsEdit, ecto, neither of them hold a candle to WLW.</p>

<p>If only iWeb supported Movable Type...</p>

<p>Excuse me while I go back and fix the formatting on the blog posts from my Mac.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>A non-story story</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scriban.com/movabletype_archives/2009/08/microsofts-secr.shtml" />
    <id>tag:scriban.com,2009:/movabletype//1.2634</id>

    <published>2009-08-28T23:41:05Z</published>
    <updated>2009-08-28T23:48:57Z</updated>

    <summary>I&apos;m going to get a cup of coffee while you read this. &quot;Microsoft is at the center of a group of companies who see Google as a threat to them in some combination of business and policy,&quot; said a source familiar with the matter, who requested anonymity to avoid retribution....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>george scriban</name>
        <uri>http://scriban.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://scriban.com/movabletype/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm going to get a cup of coffee while you read this.</p>

<blockquote>"Microsoft is at the center of a group of companies who see Google as a threat to them in some combination of business and policy," said a source familiar with the matter, who requested anonymity to avoid retribution. "The effort is designed make Google look like the big high-tech bad guy here."

<p>The meetings have occurred as frequently as once a week, sources with knowledge of the meetings say. </p>

<p>Microsoft employs several D.C.-based public relations firms, including Law Media Group, a secretive outfit founded by former Democratic operative Julian Epstein, and the Glover Park Group, which the software giant retains for issues related to "public policy and governmental affairs," according to Microsoft's website. LMG declined to discuss its work for Microsoft; GPG says it had never been involved with any 'screw Google' meetings.</p>

<p>Nevertheless, one source familiar with the meetings says, "Law Media Group has several people who work full-time on Google-bashing. Everybody knows Microsoft is trying to throw roadblocks at Google and knock them off their game. Microsoft is trying to harm Google in the regulatory, legal, and litigation arenas because they're having problems with Google in the competitive marketplace."</p>

<p>"This is textbook Microsoft," the source adds. 'Microsoft has got some of the best, highest-priced lobbyists that money can buy in Washington."</p>

<p>The meetings have been led by Fred Humphries, Microsoft's chief lobbyist in D.C. Ginny Terzano, Microsoft's Washington spokesperson, acknowledged that Google has come up in Microsoft meetings with "lawmakers, regulators, and our own consultants." But of Humphries's alleged "screw Google" meetings, she says, "This is absurd. While Google is a healthy competitor, Fred is focused on advancing policies that benefit our partners and consumers, and not running meetings of the type you describe. Your sources are badly misinformed, and your information is wrong."</p>

<p>"As you would expect, Microsoft and Fred are working to educate policymakers and regulators about the benefits of the Microsoft/Yahoo deal," Terzano says. "When you talk about the Microsoft/Yahoo deal, of course Google is going to come up."</p>

<p>A source with knowledge of the matter called Terzano's statement a "non-denial denial," saying, "This is an attempt to obfuscate the fact that they are indeed having 'screw Google' meetings."</blockquote></p>

<p><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/08/28/microsofts-secret-screw-google-meetings-in-d-c/">Microsoft's secret 'screw Google' meetings in D.C. -- DailyFinance</a></p>

<p>So, let me summarize that for you: </p>

<ul>
<li>Some anonymous guy told me "Microsoft has 'Screw Google' meetings"</li>
<li>Actual Microsoft person, with a name and everything, says on the record they don't</li>
<li>Same nameless guy says "That's exactly what someone holding 'Screw Google' meetings would say; it's proof!"</li>
</ul>

<p>Consider me a source familiar with how Microsoft competes with Google. Working for Microsoft Health Solutions, I go head-to-head with Google Health. Working in the policy space, I find myself in DC a fair amount, too. I don't waste my time thinking about how to screw Google (or Dossia, or WebMD, or anyone else).</p>

<p>Yawn.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>China Unicom to sell the iPhone in PRC</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scriban.com/movabletype_archives/2009/08/china-unicom-to.shtml" />
    <id>tag:scriban.com,2009:/movabletype//1.2633</id>

    <published>2009-08-28T23:03:52Z</published>
    <updated>2009-08-28T23:50:03Z</updated>

    <summary>Yes, China is huge, so any market entry here would have been big, but the most interesting thing about this deal, to me, is the starkly different revenue model for Apple: &quot;Under the three-year deal, iPhones will start to be sold in China in the fourth quarter of this year....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>george scriban</name>
        <uri>http://scriban.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://scriban.com/movabletype/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yes, China is huge, so any market entry here would have been big, but the most interesting thing about this deal, to me, is the starkly different revenue model for Apple:</p>

<blockquote><p> "Under the three-year deal, iPhones will start to be sold in China in the fourth quarter of this year. Unicom will not share revenue with Apple, as some operators do, and it will purchase the handsets from Apple on a wholesale basis and resell them to consumers, the Chinese company said. Unicom Chairman and Chief Executive Chang Xiaobing said at a news briefing that it will offer a subsidy to customers to lower the iPhone's price, but he didn't elaborate on how much the subsidy would be. An Apple spokesman confirmed the Unicom deal, but declined to give further details."</p>

</blockquote>

<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125144884553566179.html">China Unicom Strikes iPhone Deal - WSJ.com</a></p>

<p>In other words, Apple's selling into China Unicom as a channel, and recognizing the revenue like a retail sale, not as a subscription. China Unicom is taking the inventory risk in exchange for keeping all of the service revenue over the life of their iPhone users' subscriptions.</p>

<p>It makes sense, of course, as Apple can do heavy lifting in the US for AT&T that it can't do in China. In the US, Apple can giftwrap subscribers for AT&T through Apple Stores and Apple.com. That's a cost of acquisition that AT&T doesn't have to carry, but one that Unicom does.<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title><![CDATA[Don&rsquo;t believe the &ldquo;hype&rdquo; hype]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scriban.com/movabletype_archives/2009/08/dont-believe-th.shtml" />
    <id>tag:scriban.com,2009:/movabletype//1.2632</id>

    <published>2009-08-28T16:36:00Z</published>
    <updated>2009-08-28T16:36:02Z</updated>

    <summary>Dancho Danchev manufactures his own target in his latest Mac OS X security post: The much hyped built-in malware protection into Apple’s Snow Leopard upgrade appears to be nothing more than a XProtect.plist file containing five signatures for two of the most popular Mac OS X trojans - OSX.RSPlug and...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>george scriban</name>
        <uri>http://scriban.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://scriban.com/movabletype/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Dancho Danchev manufactures his own target in his latest Mac OS X security post:</p>  <blockquote>The much hyped built-in <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=4104">malware protection</a> into <a href="http://news.zdnet.com/2463-9595_22-335778.html">Apple’s Snow Leopard upgrade</a> appears to be nothing more than a <a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/xprotect-plist">XProtect.plist file</a> containing <a href="http://www.hard-mac.com/blog/?p=389">five signatures</a> for two of the most popular Mac OS X trojans - <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=3346">OSX.RSPlug</a> and <a href="http://www.symantec.com/business/security_response/writeup.jsp?docid=2009-012620-2836-99">OSX.Iservice</a>.</blockquote>  <p><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=4139">Snow Leopard's malware protection only scans for two Trojans | Zero Day | ZDNet.com</a></p>  <p>“Much hyped,” indeed. So hyped, in fact, <em>you can’t even see a mention of the feature on Apple’s web site.</em> The only people generating any hype around Snow Leopard’s little anti-malware feature are other bloggers, but Danchev’s not taking any shots at them, he’s implying that Apple’s foisting a false sense of security on its users by “hyping” one security feature.</p>  <p>This is <a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/security/">what Apple actually says to users about Mac OS X security</a>:</p>  <p><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; border-top: 0px; margin-right: auto; border-right: 0px" title="image" border="0" alt="image" src="http://scriban.com/movabletype/WindowsLiveWriter/Dontbelievethehypehype_86E6/image_3.png" width="400" height="184" /></p>  <p>Couldn’t be more hype-free.</p>  <p>I hate it when security researchers seem like they’re rooting for software companies to fail at protecting users. Makes me feel like they’re not interested in security, but rather they’re interested in being the smartest, snarkiest guy in the room.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>ROBINSON, Gerry (Walter Gherardi) LLB, QC</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scriban.com/movabletype_archives/2009/06/robinson-gerry.shtml" />
    <id>tag:scriban.com,2009:/movabletype//1.2630</id>

    <published>2009-06-09T00:05:13Z</published>
    <updated>2009-06-09T00:05:16Z</updated>

    <summary> Nearly a week’s gone by, but I haven’t thought of anything to say. ROBINSON, Gerry (Walter Gherardi) LLB, QC June 2, unexpectedly but peacefully of pneumonia, aged 68. Adored by his wife Alison, daughters Hilary and Alicia, son-in-law George, grandsons Henry and John, brother Mowat and all those fortunate...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>george scriban</name>
        <uri>http://scriban.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://scriban.com/movabletype/">
        <![CDATA[<p> Nearly a week’s gone by, but I haven’t thought of anything to say.</p>  <blockquote>   <p><b>ROBINSON, Gerry (Walter Gherardi)</b> LLB, QC       <br />June 2, unexpectedly but peacefully of pneumonia, aged 68. Adored by his wife Alison, daughters Hilary and Alicia, son-in-law George, grandsons Henry and John, brother Mowat and all those fortunate enough to call him friend. His professional life was devoted to the promotion of democracy and human rights both at home and abroad, his personal life to family, friends, travel, politics, and adventure. He was a gentleman, liberal, natural diplomat, raconteur, ardent Yankees, Habs and Sunderland fan, creative mastermind, fiendish tennis player, fiercely loyal friend, cribbage champion, Chairman-for-life (RLFOI) and Corinthian sailor. To say that he will be missed far and wide is to understate the obvious. Donations can be made to the Norwegian People's Aid (<a href="http://www.npaid.org">www.npaid.org</a>), a leading organisation in humanitarian mine action with which he worked closely in Bosnia. A gathering of family and friends will be held at 4:00 pm, Saturday 13 June at 120 Lascelles Blvd, Toronto. ''Touched you last''.</p> </blockquote>  <p><a href="http://v1.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/Deaths.20090608.93198138/BDAStory/BDA/deaths">globeandmail.com: ROBINSON, Gerry (Walter Gherardi)</b> LLB, QC</a></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Google and Apple should join the Firefox party | The Open Road - CNET News</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scriban.com/movabletype_archives/2009/05/google-and-appl.shtml" />
    <id>tag:scriban.com,2009:/movabletype//1.2624</id>

    <published>2009-05-15T17:51:20Z</published>
    <updated>2009-05-15T17:51:23Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[&#160; For this same reason, however, both would do better to invest in Firefox, the &quot;Linux of browsers.&quot; In some ways, the browser efforts of Apple and Google are much like the Unix efforts of IBM, Hewlett-Packard, and Sun Microsystems: they threaten to splinter the browser counterattack on Microsoft rather...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>george scriban</name>
        <uri>http://scriban.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://scriban.com/movabletype/">
        <![CDATA[<p>&#160;</p>  <blockquote>For this same reason, however, both would do better to invest in Firefox, the &quot;Linux of browsers.&quot; In some ways, the browser efforts of Apple and Google are much like the Unix efforts of IBM, Hewlett-Packard, and Sun Microsystems: they threaten to splinter the browser counterattack on Microsoft rather than solidify it.</blockquote>  <p>So, just to make sure I get this straight: Internet Explorer has been losing share to Firefox, Safari, and Chrome—three open source, standards-embracing browsers built on two frameworks—and Microsoft has been forced to enhance IE significantly in IE8 (better standards support, better privacy, better performance). Firefox is winning. Google and Apple are winning. And, thanks to competition and choice, IE users are winning to.</p>  <p>So, the solution to this non-existent problem is <em>less</em> competition?</p>  <p><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10212764-16.html">Google and Apple should join the Firefox party | The Open Road - CNET News</a></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
